2004 Volkswagen Caddy vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volkswagen Caddy would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 270 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy.
Because 2012 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. (126 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Volkswagen Caddy | 2012 Holden Calais | |
Make | Volkswagen | Holden |
Model | Caddy | Calais |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 126 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |