2004 Volkswagen Caddy vs. 2012 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volkswagen Caddy would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. (99 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy.
Because 2012 SsangYong Chairman W is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 SsangYong Chairman W. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Volkswagen Caddy | 2012 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Volkswagen | SsangYong |
Model | Caddy | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |