2004 Volkswagen Golf vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volkswagen Golf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volkswagen Golf would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Golf (197 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2012 Suzuki Equator. (152 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Golf should accelerate faster than 2012 Suzuki Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Golf weights approximately 361 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volkswagen Golf (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Suzuki Equator. (232 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Volkswagen Golf will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Suzuki Equator.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Volkswagen Golf 2012 Suzuki Equator
Make Volkswagen Suzuki
Model Golf Equator
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type Hatchback Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1895 cc 2488 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 152 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 280 Nm 232 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1336 kg 975 kg
Vehicle Length 4220 mm 5250 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Consumption 6.2 L/100km 10.2 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 8 L/100km 6.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 80 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]