2004 Volkswagen Passat vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volkswagen Passat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volkswagen Passat would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Passat (170 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Passat should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volkswagen Passat (225 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Volkswagen Passat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Volkswagen Passat | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Volkswagen | Renault |
Model | Passat | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 76.8 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |