2004 Volkswagen Polo vs. 1943 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Volkswagen Polo | 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
| Model | Polo | PV 801-10 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1943 |
| Engine Size | 1421 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3260 mm |
