2004 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,421 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (335 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 2004 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Volkswagen Polo | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Holden |
| Model | Polo | Cruze |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1421 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 335 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2685 mm |
