2004 Volvo S40 vs. 1996 Xedos 6
To start off, 2004 Volvo S40 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Xedos 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Xedos 6 would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S40 (218 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1996 Xedos 6. (106 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Xedos 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S40 weights approximately 311 kg more than 1996 Xedos 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo S40 (320 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Xedos 6. (138 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Xedos 6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Volvo S40 | 1996 Xedos 6 | |
Make | Volvo | Xedos |
Model | S40 | 6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2521 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 218 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 138 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2620 mm |