2004 Volvo V70 vs. 1978 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2004 Volvo V70 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo V70 (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1978 Datsun 260Z. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1978 Datsun 260Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo V70 weights approximately 482 kg more than 1978 Datsun 260Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Datsun 260Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Datsun 260Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo V70 (330 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Datsun 260Z. (213 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo V70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Datsun 260Z.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Volvo V70 | 1978 Datsun 260Z | |
Make | Volvo | Datsun |
Model | V70 | 260Z |
Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1582 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4135 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |