2004 Volvo V70 vs. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Volvo V70 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo V70 (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo V70 weights approximately 382 kg more than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo V70 (330 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (237 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo V70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Volvo V70 | 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Volvo | Oldsmobile |
Model | V70 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1582 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2640 mm |