2004 Volvo XC90 vs. 1970 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (207 HP) has 154 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 995 kg more than 1970 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Volvo XC90 | 1970 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Volvo | Zastava |
| Model | XC90 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 2435 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2430 mm |
