2004 Volvo XC90 vs. 1986 Volvo 242
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Volvo 242. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Volvo 242 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (208 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1986 Volvo 242. (97 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1986 Volvo 242. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 748 kg more than 1986 Volvo 242. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Volvo 242. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Volvo 242. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Volvo 242.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Volvo XC90 | 1986 Volvo 242 | |
Make | Volvo | Volvo |
Model | XC90 | 242 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2435 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2038 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |