2004 Volvo XC90 vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Tundra. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 386 kg more than 2000 Toyota Tundra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Tundra. (298 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Tundra.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Volvo XC90 2000 Toyota Tundra
Make Volvo Toyota
Model XC90 Tundra
Year Released 2004 2000
Body Type SUV Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2901 cc 3400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 268 HP 187 HP
Torque 380 Nm 298 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 3600 RPM
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2106 kg 1720 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 5530 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1920 mm
Vehicle Height 1790 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2870 mm 3270 mm