2004 Volvo XC90 vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 2,901 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 95 more horse power than 2011 Chrysler 200. (173 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2011 Chrysler 200.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Chrysler 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chrysler 200. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chrysler 200.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Volvo XC90 | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Volvo | Chrysler |
Model | XC90 | 200 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 173 HP |
Torque | 380 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4869 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2766 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 64 L |