2004 Volvo XC90 vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Ram (390 HP) has 122 more horse power than 2004 Volvo XC90. (268 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Ram weights approximately 240 kg more than 2004 Volvo XC90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Dodge Ram. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Ram (551 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo XC90. (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2012 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Volvo XC90 | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Volvo | Dodge |
Model | XC90 | Ram |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 390 HP |
Torque | 380 Nm | 551 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2106 kg | 2346 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5817 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3569 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 98 L |