2004 Westfield XTR 2 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 817 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | 2010 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | Westfield | Chevrolet |
| Model | XTR 2 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 444 kg | 1261 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2830 mm |
