2004 Westfield XTR 2 vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS (402 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 1446 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
| Make | Westfield | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | XTR 2 | CLS |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 402 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 444 kg | 1890 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1882 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2875 mm |
