2004 Westfield XTR 2 vs. 2012 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2012 Toyota Tundra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 886 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | 2012 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Westfield | Toyota |
| Model | XTR 2 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 381 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 444 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 3710 mm |
