2004 Xedos 9 vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Xedos 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Xedos 9 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Xedos 9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Xedos 9 (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Xedos 9 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Xedos 9. (212 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Xedos 9.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Xedos 9 | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Xedos | Mazda |
Model | 9 | 3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 212 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2639 mm |