2004 Xedos 9 vs. 2012 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Xedos 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Xedos 9 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Xedos 9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volkswagen Polo (178 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2004 Xedos 9. (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 2004 Xedos 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Xedos 9 weights approximately 316 kg more than 2012 Volkswagen Polo.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volkswagen Polo (250 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Xedos 9. (212 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2012 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Xedos 9.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Xedos 9 | 2012 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Xedos | Volkswagen |
Model | 9 | Polo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 178 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 212 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1269 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1682 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2470 mm |