2004 ZAZ Slavuta vs. 2010 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2010 Mazda B2300 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 ZAZ Slavuta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 ZAZ Slavuta would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2004 ZAZ Slavuta. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 2004 ZAZ Slavuta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2004 ZAZ Slavuta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 ZAZ Slavuta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 ZAZ Slavuta | 2010 Mazda B2300 | |
Make | ZAZ | Mazda |
Model | Slavuta | B2300 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1091 cc | 2266 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2840 mm |