2005 AC Aceca vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue
To start off, 2005 AC Aceca is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 845 kg more than 2005 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue has automatic transmission and 2005 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 2005 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 AC Aceca | 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | |
Make | AC | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Aceca | Camargue |
Year Released | 2005 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 107 L |