2005 AC Aceca vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2005 AC Aceca is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 AC Aceca weights approximately 565 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 AC Aceca | 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Aceca | Celeste |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2350 mm |