2005 AC Aceca vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2005 AC Aceca is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (66 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 AC Aceca weights approximately 300 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 AC Aceca (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (123 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 AC Aceca | 1994 Rover 200 | |
| Make | AC | Rover |
| Model | Aceca | 200 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
