2005 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2005 AC Aceca is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKA would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2005 AC Aceca. (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 2005 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 290 kg more than 2005 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 436 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 AC Aceca. (407 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2005 AC Aceca | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
Make | AC | Jaguar |
Model | Aceca | XKA |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 466 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 843 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2590 mm |