2005 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2005 AC Aceca is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 815 kg more than 2005 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 AC Aceca (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2005 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2005 AC Aceca | 2001 Ford Econoline | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Econoline |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3510 mm |