2005 AC Aceca vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 AC Aceca (301 HP) has 59 more horse power than 2012 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 AC Aceca (407 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 2005 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2005 AC Aceca | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | AC | Holden |
Model | Aceca | UTE |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |