2005 AC Cobra vs. 1997 BMW M3
To start off, 2005 AC Cobra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 AC Cobra (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1997 BMW M3. (240 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW M3 weights approximately 238 kg more than 2005 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 AC Cobra (400 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW M3. (236 Nm). This means 2005 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 AC Cobra | 1997 BMW M3 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Cobra | M3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 236 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2710 mm |