2005 Acura CL vs. 1982 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2005 Acura CL is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Mustang (225 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Acura CL. (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura CL weights approximately 97 kg more than 1982 Ford Mustang.

Because 1982 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Mustang (407 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Acura CL. (294 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Acura CL. 2005 Acura CL has automatic transmission and 1982 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1982 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Acura CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Acura CL 1982 Ford Mustang
Make Acura Ford
Model CL Mustang
Year Released 2005 1982
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3210 cc 4942 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 223 HP 225 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 294 Nm 407 Nm
Torque RPM 4700 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 76.2 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1580 kg 1483 kg
Vehicle Length 4890 mm 4560 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2560 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]