2005 Acura CL vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2005 Acura CL is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura CL (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura CL weights approximately 395 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura CL (294 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2005 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura CL | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Acura | Rover |
Model | CL | 200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |