2005 Acura MDX vs. 2011 Kia Optima
To start off, 2011 Kia Optima is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Acura MDX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Acura MDX would be higher. At 3,474 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Acura MDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Optima (274 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2005 Acura MDX. (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2005 Acura MDX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura MDX weights approximately 484 kg more than 2011 Kia Optima.
Because 2005 Acura MDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Kia Optima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Acura MDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Kia Optima (364 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Acura MDX. (343 Nm). This means 2011 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Acura MDX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura MDX | 2011 Kia Optima | |
Make | Acura | Kia |
Model | MDX | Optima |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3474 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 266 HP | 274 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 364 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2019 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4844 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1831 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2797 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 70 L |