2005 Acura MDX vs. 2012 Ford F-150
To start off, 2012 Ford F-150 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Acura MDX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Acura MDX would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-150 (411 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2005 Acura MDX. (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 Acura MDX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford F-150 weights approximately 710 kg more than 2005 Acura MDX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-150 (588 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Acura MDX. (343 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Acura MDX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura MDX | 2012 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | MDX | F-150 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3474 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 266 HP | 411 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 588 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2019 kg | 2729 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5603 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2192 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1994 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3386 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 98 L |