2005 Acura NSX vs. 1967 Holden HR
To start off, 2005 Acura NSX is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 3,048 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Holden HR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura NSX (252 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura NSX weights approximately 162 kg more than 1967 Holden HR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura NSX (285 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Holden HR. (245 Nm). This means 2005 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Holden HR.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Acura NSX | 1967 Holden HR | |
| Make | Acura | Holden |
| Model | NSX | HR |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
