2005 Acura NSX vs. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30
To start off, 2005 Acura NSX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura NSX (252 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 weights approximately 143 kg more than 2005 Acura NSX.
Because 2005 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura NSX (285 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (260 Nm). This means 2005 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura NSX | 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | |
Make | Acura | BMW |
Model | NSX | Mini ACV 30 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1595 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2890 mm |