2005 Acura RL vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Acura RL is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura RL weights approximately 572 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2005 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Acura RL has automatic transmission and 1952 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1952 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Acura RL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura RL | 1952 Riley RM A | |
Make | Acura | Riley |
Model | RL | RM A |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 3471 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1807 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2870 mm |