2005 Acura RL vs. 2001 Daewoo Vada
To start off, 2005 Acura RL is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RL (296 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura RL weights approximately 494 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Daewoo Vada. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura RL (353 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2005 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Acura RL | 2001 Daewoo Vada | |
| Make | Acura | Daewoo |
| Model | RL | Vada |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3471 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1807 kg | 1313 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |
