2005 Acura RSX vs. 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2005 Acura RSX. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2005 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura RSX weights approximately 306 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Acura RSX | 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
| Make | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | RSX | 6C |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 98 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1256 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2250 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 53 L |
