2005 Acura RSX vs. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RSX (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 256 kg more than 2005 Acura RSX.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura RSX (191 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2005 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Acura RSX | 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | |
| Make | Acura | Austin-Healey |
| Model | RSX | Tickford |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1955 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2443 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1274 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2600 mm |
