2005 Acura RSX vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RSX (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura RSX (191 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm). This means 2005 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Acura RSX | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Acura | Nissan |
| Model | RSX | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |
