2005 Acura RSX vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RSX (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura RSX weights approximately 259 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura RSX (191 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 220. (144 Nm). This means 2005 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura RSX | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Acura | Volvo |
Model | RSX | 220 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 144 Nm |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1274 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 45 L |