2005 Acura RSX vs. 1967 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RSX (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 790 kg more than 2005 Acura RSX.
Because 1967 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura RSX | 1967 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | RSX | DeVille |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1256 kg | 2046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 82 L |