2005 Acura RSX vs. 1969 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RSX (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1969 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 68 kg more than 2005 Acura RSX.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura RSX (191 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2005 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura RSX | 1969 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Acura | Nissan |
Model | RSX | Cedric |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1222 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |