2005 Acura RSX vs. 1978 Chevrolet El Camino
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino (350 HP) has 190 more horse power than 2005 Acura RSX. (160 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 2005 Acura RSX.
Because 1978 Chevrolet El Camino is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chevrolet El Camino. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura RSX | 1978 Chevrolet El Camino | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | RSX | El Camino |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 350 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2980 mm |