2005 Acura RSX vs. 1982 Dodge 600
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RSX (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura RSX weights approximately 109 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura RSX (191 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm). This means 2005 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Acura RSX | 1982 Dodge 600 | |
| Make | Acura | Dodge |
| Model | RSX | 600 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1274 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2630 mm |
