2005 Acura RSX vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RSX (160 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura RSX weights approximately 409 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura RSX (191 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm). This means 2005 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura RSX | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Acura | Nissan |
Model | RSX | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 191 Nm | 115 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1274 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2420 mm |