2005 Acura RSX vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RSX (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura RSX weights approximately 391 kg more than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura RSX (194 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm). This means 2005 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Acura RSX | 1983 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Acura | Nissan |
| Model | RSX | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1270 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 194 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1256 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2420 mm |
