2005 Acura RSX vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RSX (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura RSX weights approximately 452 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura RSX (191 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Acura RSX | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Acura | Zastava |
| Model | RSX | 102 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1222 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2160 mm |
