2005 Acura RSX vs. 1986 Chrysler ES
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RSX (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura RSX weights approximately 111 kg more than 1986 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura RSX (194 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm). This means 2005 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura RSX | 1986 Chrysler ES | |
Make | Acura | Chrysler |
Model | RSX | ES |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 194 Nm | 165 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1256 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2470 mm |