2005 Acura RSX vs. 1986 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RSX (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1986 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura RSX weights approximately 249 kg more than 1986 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura RSX (191 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (144 Nm). This means 2005 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Acura RSX | 1986 Mercury Lynx | |
| Make | Acura | Mercury |
| Model | RSX | Lynx |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1859 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1274 kg | 1025 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2400 mm |
