2005 Acura RSX vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Acura RSX (210 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura RSX weights approximately 316 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Acura RSX (194 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (114 Nm). This means 2005 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura RSX | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Acura | Renault |
Model | RSX | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 194 Nm | 114 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 75.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1256 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.6 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |