2005 Acura RSX vs. 1999 Lotus M250
To start off, 2005 Acura RSX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lotus M250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lotus M250 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotus M250 (247 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2005 Acura RSX. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 2005 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Acura RSX weights approximately 306 kg more than 1999 Lotus M250.
Because 1999 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotus M250 (321 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Acura RSX. (194 Nm). This means 1999 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Acura RSX | 1999 Lotus M250 | |
Make | Acura | Lotus |
Model | RSX | M250 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 194 Nm | 321 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1256 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1180 mm |